Below is the progress I have made on my Follow-Up Analysis.
Major Weaknesses
1.
Unclear Self-Organization
The Fog House is intended to be a combination of strategies that can be
implemented in part or in whole by the residents of informal settlements that
have a high number of fog days per year, in regions such as the west coasts of
North and South America, South Africa, and Japan for example. The project was
critiqued for being too heavy handed and interpreted as a top down approach. I
believe what was missing in providing a successful argument was a clear
perspective drawing or render of the project in situ. The render that I did
present (Figure 01) was critiqued for having the houses too close to the
foreground for their integration to be discerned.
2.
‘Checklist’ Architecture
The tactics used in the design of the Fog House were considered to be
too pragmatic, as if each gesture corresponded to an item on a checklist. The
design was interpreted as the kind of intervention that an NGO or developer
would propose. I believe that a more extensive range of formal experiments in the
tactical implementation would have aided my argument and resulted in a more
intriguing architectural expression.
3.
Lack of Detailing
I understand that my project had a lack of detailing. Given more time, I
would have liked to complete a wall section and critical details to depict the
sandbag and wood wall assembly, as well as its connection to the ladder, the
foundation and the fog net structure. I attempted to show the construction in
my plans and sections, but a larger scale wall section and critical details would
have been extremely beneficial in making my argument.
Major Strengths
1.
Thesis & Strategies
I believe that my thesis statement and three strategies are well written
and unambiguous. Their inherent universality will help me to continue to build
upon them in future design work by allowing me to apply them in any context. I aim
to refine them as the semester progresses.
2.
Tactics
I believe my project is well resolved tactically; each gesture was
carefully considered and aimed to integrate multiple strategies. For example,
the foundation addressed both the issues of flood prevention and water storage,
and the envelope was designed to be secure and sustainable, both
environmentally and economically. I will continue to build upon this in future
design work by exploring different tactics that can achieve the same goals
using a minimal number of architectural gestures to achieve the greatest
effect.
Opportunities Moving Forward
1.
Further Exploration of
Interconnectivity
I have the opportunity moving forward to develop a further
interconnectedness of resources in my design work. In project two my mandate
will not be to design for the global south, but for an entirely different
context and demographic. As expressed in my revised thesis statement, I do not
believe that the paradigm of treating water at the source is an effective
strategy for providing safe drinking water for everyone. There are ways to
collect, store, and purify water at the micro scale that can be integrated into
a larger system that serves the entire community. In doing this I aim to return
control over the survival of underprivileged communities to community members
from large water purification companies that ignore them in the name of profit.
2.
Architectural Expression
I have the opportunity to further explore the architectural
expression of my design work in the next project. I will try to be more
experimental in my work by selecting a context and user group that allows me more
flexibility in an economic sense to use higher quality materials and more
innovative technologies. The larger scale of the second project will also aid
me in working toward a more intriguing architectural expression.
Conclusion
The three new authoritative research
resources that I will be investigating are:
1. France,
R. L. (2002). Handbook of water
sensitive planning and design. Boca Raton, Fla.: Lewis Publishers.
This resource is relevant in my continued investigation because it
offers a comprehensive list of tactics related to water collection and
management. It will better inform my design by giving me a number of basic
tactics that I can improve upon.
2. Moe, K. (2008). Integrated
design in contemporary architecture. New York: Princeton Architectural
Press.
This resource is relevant in my continued investigation it contains a
number of projects that have successfully integrated multiple aspects of their
design, particularly with regards to systems and sustainable practices. It will
better inform my design by broadening my understanding of integrated design and
also provide a number of precedents that may be applicable to my future design
work.
3.
Moore, C. W., & Lidz, J. (1994). Water and architecture. New York:
H.N. Abrams.
This resource is relevant in my continued investigation because it will
provide me with a number of potential precedents in my next design project. It
will better inform my design by giving me a greater understanding of the
symbolic relationship between water and architecture and how to integrate the
tectonic qualities of water into my design.
Refined Thesis
Abstract
“Innovation does not consist in loading a
building with technology and complicated systems but in developing simple,
passive, yet sophisticated means that can be easily communicated to the people
who use it and are intuitively operated.”
- Francesca Galeazzi, Arup Associates,
London
The numbers of
people who lack access to safe drinking water suffer and are killed needlessly
from curable waterborne disease every day are daunting; nearly half of the
entire world population suffer at any given time from a health problem caused
by water and sanitation deficits. Architecture has the potential to integrate
crucial water collection and storage strategies to make a significant
improvement in this growing global phenomenon. I believe that access to safe
drinking water is a fundamental human right, and that no other human being
should have the power to withhold any of the elements critical to life from any
other human being. There is an enormous imbalance of access to water weighted
toward the wealthy, to the point that millions of people die each day from
disease or dehydration.
Figure 01
References
Aquilino, M. J. (2010). Beyond
shelter: architecture and human dignity. New York, NY: Metropolis Books
:.
Bell, B., & Wakeford, K. (2008). Expanding architecture: design as activism. New York: Metropolis
Books.
Current projects. (2014, January 21). Architecture for humanity. Retrieved February 6, 2014, from
http://architectureforhumanity.org/projects
Design like you give a damn [2]: building
change from the ground up. (2012). New York: Abrams.
Fog harvesting. (n.d.). ClimateTechWiki:
a clean technology platform. Retrieved January 22, 2014, from
http://climatetechwiki.org/content/fog-harvesting
Grotao Community Centre. (n.d.). Urban-think
tank - interdisciplinary design studio. Retrieved January 21, 2014, from
http://www.u-tt.com/projects_Grotao.html
Imizamo Yethu. (n.d.). Census
2011. Retrieved January 23, 2014, from
http://census2011.adrianfrith.com/place/199043
Lepik, A. (2010). Small scale,
big change: new architectures of social engagement. New York: Museum of
Modern Art ;.
Meinhold, B. (2013). Urgent
architecture: 40 sustainable housing solutions for a changing world. New
York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Rainwater catchment. (n.d.). Architecture.
Retrieved January 21, 2014, from
http://www.architecture.com/SustainabilityHub/Designstrategies/Water/1-3-1-2-Rainwatercatchment.aspx
South Africa - Cape Town. (n.d.). World
weather information service - cape town. Retrieved January 23, 2014,
from http://worldweather.wmo.int/035/c00138.htm
Zaleski, A. (n.d.). Trudging through the township: on tour of imizamo
yethu. Glimpse. Retrieved
January 23, 2014, from http://archive.glimpse.org/people/blog/user/14125/2009/jun/7/trudging-through-the-township-on-tour-of-imizamo-y/
No comments:
Post a Comment